Genre and Register of Antagonist’s Language in Media: An Appraisal Study of Indonesian Newspapers
Abstract
This research explores how the language of the antagonists is unfolded in print Indonesian media. The analysis is focused on the exploitation of types of texts (genres) and the register. These are explored through the lexis, transitivity, appraisal systems, and text structure. The data were news, editorials, and letters to editors, collected from Kompas, Jawa Pos, Solopos, and Suara Merdeka from May to October 2012. Further selected using criterion-based sampling techniques, the data resulted in eight texts to analyze. In addition to the linguistic analysis, interviews were conducted with the stakeholders of the social issues. The results show that antagonists used the three types of macro genres to express their ideologies in the newspapers. At the level of register, the antagonists develop their attitudes through their feeling (affect), as well as evaluation about other participants (judgment) or things (appreciation). They even amplify and align their attitude through graduation and engagement.
Originally authored by Riyadi Santosa, Agus Dwi Priyanto, Ardiana Nuraeni, published in K@ta, Vol 16, No 1 (2014).
References
Atmadi, T. (1985). Sistem pers Indonesia: Catatan dan teks kuliah. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.
Bell, A. (2007). The discourse structure of news stories. In T. V. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies (Vol. 1). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Chen, J. (2008). An investigation into the preference for discourse patterns in the Chinese EFL learning context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 188-210.
Devitt, A. J., Bawarshi, A., & Reiff, M. J. (2003). Materiality and genre in the study of discourse community. English College, 65(5). 541-558.
Duszak, A. (1998). Academic writing in English and Polish: Comparing and subverting genres, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2). 191-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192
Gamble, M. W., & Gamble, T. K. (1989). Introducing mass communication. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985a). Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985b). Spoken and written language. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press & Ann Arbor.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implication for ESL, Tesol Quarterly, 30(4). 693-722
Ihlstrom, C. (2004). The evolution of a new(s) genre: Gothenburg Studies in Informatics.
Lacey, N. (2000). Narrative and genre: Key concepts in media studies. London: McMilland Press Ltd.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
Mann, W. C., & Thomson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory. Text, 8(3). 243-281.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Moessner, L. (2001). Genre, text type, style, register: A terminological maze?. European Journal of English Studies, 5(2). 131-138. doi: 10.1076/ ejes.5.2.131.7312
Power, R. (2000). Mapping rhetorical structures to text structures by constraint satisfaction. Brighton: ITRI, University of Brighton.
Ramsay, G. (2000). Linearity in rhetorical organisation: A comparative cross-cultural analysis of news text from People’s Republic of China and Australia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2). 241-257.
Santosa, R. (2003). Semiotika sosial pandangan terhadap bahasa. Surabaya: Pustaka Eureka.
Santosa, R. (2007). Register of English news. Unpublished manuscript, Fakultas Sastra dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Santosa, R. (2010). Logika wacana: Analisis hubungan konjungtif berdasarkan linguistik sistemik fungsional. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Santosa, R., Nababan, M. R., & Wiratno, M. A. (2010). Posisi semiotik genre mikro dan makro. Unpublished Manuscript, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Santosa, R., Priyanto, A. D., & Nuraenni, A. (2011). Bahasa demokratis di media masa Indonesia. Unpublished Manuscript, Fakultas Sastra dan Seni Rupa, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Spradely, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Spradely, J. P. (2006). Metode etnografi (Ethnographic methods) (M. Z. Elizabeth, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Stoehler, V., (2012). The battle for the citizens’ opinions, the power of language, the media and climate change: The sources and their strategies in the U.S. and in Sweden. Observatorio, 6(1). 25-46.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif: Tatalangkah dan tehnik-tehnik teoritisasi data (Basis of qualitative research: Grounded research procedures and techniques) (M. Shodiq & I. Muttaqien, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Stuart-Smith, V. (2007). The hierarchical organization of text as conceptualized by rhetorical structure theory: A systemic functional perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 27(1). 41-61.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Full Text: PDF