<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Agus D. Priyanto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id</link>
	<description>~ [d] is a phoneme; it makes &#039;work&#039; different from &#039;word&#039;.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Relational Vs. Existential Process</title>
		<link>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/07/relational-vs-existential-process/</link>
		<comments>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/07/relational-vs-existential-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agusdepe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourse Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/07/relational-vs-existential-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me start this post with an example. Let&#8217;s have a look at the following clauses. (a) There is my fiancee on the line. (b) There is my fiancee. Both clauses (a) and (b) are similar. Both start with there, both use is (be). Actually, they are different. They represent different experience. Clause (a) is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/07/relational-vs-existential-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goal or Range?</title>
		<link>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/05/goal-or-range/</link>
		<comments>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/05/goal-or-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agusdepe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourse Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Material Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systemic Functional Linguistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Systemic Functional Linguistics tradition, when discussing the transitivity of a clause, we need to identify three items: the process, participants, and circumstances. One common difficulty occurs when we analyze material processes; that is the issue of one type of participants. As you are all aware, in material process there are Actor and either Goal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://agusdepe.staff.uns.ac.id/2011/10/05/goal-or-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

